September Member Update

subscribe-to-newsletter

Midland Town Council has begun its work to set the Town’s operating and capital budgets for 2014.  Council’s first meeting on September 11th dealt with the operating budget and a lot of work still needs to be done to create a budget that is responsible and fair to the people of Midland.

Here are some key facts and observations:

1) Council previously directed Town staff to prepare two budget scenarios – showing both  0% and 2%  increases in the operating budget over 2013.

2) On September 11th, Town staff presented Council with a single draft budget showing a 3.91% increase even before a list of additional items that add up to another 2%.  As it stands now, if all of this gets approved, the overall operating budget will rise approximately 6% ($1 Million) from last year and local taxes will rise accordingly.

3) The Fire Department is asking for an increase of 2.35%.  Not only is this number above both the 0% and 2% targets but the Fire Department should be able to show leadership this year since it received a budget increase last year of 2% followed by a mid-term increase of another 5%.  A two-year total increase of 9% for Fire is simply unacceptable and irresponsible.

4) Police are looking at a 2014 spending increase in the 1.7% to 1.9% range stated Police Services Board Chair Kathy Willis.  This follows a 2013 increase of 5.6%.  Averaged over two years this is way more than most residents of Midland see in their pay or pension cheques.  While we can hope this marks the beginning of a new trend in Police budgets, it is all premised on Police wage and benefit increases being held to 1% next year.  According to Ms. Willis and the Police Chief there is only “agreement in principle” to the 1% increase for two large Police employee groups and thus no certainty.  This lack of certainty is one reason we often have last-minute or mid-term budget surprises.  It is mistaken efficiency to rush to complete a budget if surprises are waiting around the corner.

5) On the subject of surprises, it appears nobody has been warning Council or the public about the depletion of Development Charges reserve funds that have been used for several years to offset borrowing costs in departmental budgets.  Development Charges are the money new home buyers in Midland pay as their contribution to the capital cost of existing or planned infrastructure such as roads and recreational facilities.  The Parks and Recreation budget for 2014 loses $133,000 in Development Charges revenue to help pay the debt on the NSSRC because the money is no longer there.  Making up for this means revenue has to increase or spending has to decrease or a combination of both needs to happen.  Of course the easy way to increase revenue is to just dump the problem on taxpayers.

Parks and Recreation’s budget request for 2014 now stands at 5.43%.  The elephant in the Parks and Recreation budget remains the NSSRC.  Total spending for the NSSRC is projected to be more than $2.1 Million with revenue offsetting only $815,000 (about 38% of the total).  This leaves a deficit of $1.3 Million that gets dumped on Midland taxpayers even though at least half of all regular NSSRC users live in Tiny, Tay and Penetanguishene and contribute nothing towards this deficit.  Clearly a new, sustainable business model needs to be developed and Council needs to resist ad-hoc, band-aid solutions that fail to address the real problems.  In the meantime, Council will be acting on a recommendation from the Department Head to hold a closed meeting to look at ways to get the budget increase down.

6)  The Library budget is about $1 million annually representing about 5% of our local taxes.  Their 2014 budget request currently exceeds 4%.  Average residents of Midland are not going to see anything like a 4% increase in their incomes so why should it be acceptable for the Library to spend at rates much higher than inflation?

To summarize, a 6% spending increase next year would return us to the dark days of previous Councils that failed to restrain spending or understand the challenges facing residents.  Our local economy continues to struggle, good-quality jobs are scarce and household incomes are low.  When Town staff is instructed by Council to model 0% and 2% budget increases, it wastes time to present increases of 4% to 6%.  The Department Heads need to go back to the drawing board and get the job done.  They are the ones with the knowledge, talent and responsibility to recommend the best ways to achieve Council’s goals.  They need to focus on making wise changes to how our Town operates.

The main challenge and opportunity here is GROWTH.  Development Charges are depleted because there is not enough recent growth to repay money Midland borrowed years ago.  Town budgets need to remove all unnecessary costs and spending needs to focus on driving growth and economic development. Unless new money is coming in, there should be no more money going out.  That is how almost all of us have to live our lives every day – adjusting what we would like against what we can afford.
Budget deliberations continue this Thursday, September 19th at 6:00 p.m., when Council considers the capital budget.  Next Wednesday, September 25th at 6:00 p.m., members of the public have an opportunity to make submissions to Council on the budget.  We hope submissions from the public will help Council do the right things and not just the easy things.  And we hope for much better results as work continues on the 2014 budget.

Roy Ellis and George Dixon on behalf of Midlandcommunity.ca

Like MidlandCommunity.ca on Facebook

3 Comments on "September Member Update"

  1. Well done Roy and George. I’m glad somebody is minding the Store. Keep up the good work.

  2. In my 16 years with Revenue Canada Customs and Excise, now Border Services, 12 were spent at headquarters in Ottawa. During that time, I was involved in many budgetary exercises. We had IOPS (Interim Operational plan Submissions), MYOPS (Multi-year Operational Plan submissions), and COPS (Current Year operational plan submissions). All went through many levels of scrutiny before approval.

    If I had submitted any type of document exceeding parameters set by the Minister, it would have been thrown back on my desk and I would have had a strip torn off me for an incorrect submission and missing a deadline since it would take time to revamp the proposal.

    Clearly the Council, rather than just directly staff, should have made sure that all department heads knew of the budgetary constraints for the 2014 fiscal year, and if they did, they should be hauled over the carpet for wasting Councils’ time and money to submit something outside the given parameters.

    Maybe Council should re-examine zero based budgeting!

    This town is in decline. Businesses are closing regularly. No new industry is shopping around and any opportunities we had are long gone. Young families are gone or are leaving to find work in Barrie and further South, or far North for that matter. The wealthy retirees that only whine about how much tax they pay, but can afford to pay it anyway and do, are passing on quickly with ever increasing numbers leaving nothing behind. The shrinking tax base needs less overhead not more.

    The Council is the group of leaders in this town. They better start leading and stop letting the tail wag the dog. This is a town in crisis. For all intents and purpose, the Council should be looking at a 0% to -2% budget to correspond with the reduction in tax paying residents and businesses. In addition:

    1. Create a “Business friendly” environment
    2. Active participation on industrial boards Provincially to see what types of businesses would suit this region and go after them. Investigate what new industries are growing and go after them with some sort of incentive. I realize many of the old tax incentive programs are long gone and not allowed in Ontario any more.
    3. Reduction of Municipal ‘red tape’. Less red tape means stream lined processes and a reduction of staff requirements, saving money.
    4. Higher Council visibility soliciting feedback and getting the residents and businesses onside and onboard with new, innovative ideas.
    5. Making sure any worthy ideas are actioned and not just cataloged and shelved.

    I grew up here. I came back here. Since I have, I’m not impressed.

    -Neil Waters

    • Thanks Neil. Excellent comments and importantly, solid recommendations. Thank you for joining this very important debate. Please be assured we will advance your communication to Council. Cheers
      Roy Ellis

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*